[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: #2 ACD report3 3/3, the report page - short table headers



done
http://www.unappel.ch/public/091029-ACDstat/091103-acd-stat-37410.html

On 2009-11-03 13:24, Emin Gabrielyan wrote:
not done

"The header titles are much shorter, so the table takes less space and more space is left for histograms."
check carefully the doc file which is attached again

"ACD report3 3/3, the report page - short table headers"


On 2009-11-03 12:15, Done-By Oussama Hammami wrote:
done

On 2009-11-02 22:01, Task-By Emin Gabrielyan wrote:
The format of the report page (example: http://unappel.ch/public/091029-ACDstat/091102-acd-stat-37410.html)

The table headers are much shorter, so the table takes less space and more space is left for histograms.

I do not understand how “Rejected to balance” is working. This must be the number of rejects sent by the routing system during the interval. Is it correct? Why there are 0 rejects out of 45 attempts in the case of the first line? Please explain.

Why the billing priorities are 2 and 1. They must not be higher? These are the billing priorities of cloned connections. Please explain.

The remarks (in track changes mode) are in the attached DOC file